DGDenoise
DGDenoise
Ha ha, 444 support is trivial. I'll add it and update the binary today.
DGDenoise
Updated the online version to support YUV444P16.
- thechaoscoder
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2020 8:34 am
DGDenoise
Thanks, you're the best squirrel I know
- thechaoscoder
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2020 8:34 am
DGDenoise
Can Sandy Cheeks fly? I don't think so
DGDenoise
What about Scrat? Can't fly but what is so great about that?
DGDenoise
You said status is in the collective valuation. Think about it. Scrat?
- thechaoscoder
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2020 8:34 am
DGDenoise
Scrat is obsessive, not very bright and unlucky. If he could fly all this problems would be solved and the acorn would be his
- Bullwinkle
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2019 6:37 pm
DGDenoise
Ice Age animation is lazy. Artificial goodness!
- thechaoscoder
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2020 8:34 am
DGDenoise
Your grannie?
Let's go release this filter right now.
Let's go release this filter right now.
- Mr. Peabody
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2019 9:20 am
DGDenoise
Any interest in a filter implementing nVidia's Optix denoiser?
https://github.com/DeclanRussell/NvidiaAIDenoiser
I don't know how fast it is. Could be an issue if it is very slow.
https://github.com/DeclanRussell/NvidiaAIDenoiser
I don't know how fast it is. Could be an issue if it is very slow.
DGDenoise
Hmm, 50 ms for 1024x1024 and it BLOWS AWAY DGDenoise. I'll try to get some screenshots for you.
Also supports temporal denoising!
Also supports temporal denoising!
- thechaoscoder
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2020 8:34 am
DGDenoise
Do I smell a new dg filter? Smells at least not like broccoli!
Temporal denoising is a huge +
I tried it v2.4 with but don't really see any difference
Code: Select all
Denoiser.exe -i '.\test2.vpy - 1231.png' -o test1.png
- Attachments
-
DGDenoise
That's strange. I'll try it with your PNG. It's worked great on everything I've tried.thechaoscoder wrote: ↑Fri Feb 03, 2023 5:36 amI tried it v2.4 with but don't really see any difference
DGDenoise
Hmm, yes, it doesn't work so good on that.
Read the discussion here and you'll see other people saying similar things.
https://declanrussell.com/portfolio/nvidia-ai-denoiser/
Maybe it's really just specialized for noise from 3D renderings and so has trouble with some 2D images. I'll look into it some more. If it doesn't look good for general use, I'll do some work on DGDenoise to improve it, such as adding temporal. If we could accept 50ms for Optix, we can accept it for DGDenoise, if the bang for the buck is there.
Read the discussion here and you'll see other people saying similar things.
https://declanrussell.com/portfolio/nvidia-ai-denoiser/
Maybe it's really just specialized for noise from 3D renderings and so has trouble with some 2D images. I'll look into it some more. If it doesn't look good for general use, I'll do some work on DGDenoise to improve it, such as adding temporal. If we could accept 50ms for Optix, we can accept it for DGDenoise, if the bang for the buck is there.
DGDenoise
OK, after some more testing on a wider range of samples, it's clear Optix is a bust for our purposes.
DGDenoise
Oh yeah. She'll touch your heart. Now let's touch your soul.